Comments on: Harbucks Revisited

By: Nikki

Nikki — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:48:20 +0000

Joshua, nothing new on your friends coffee blog there. The funny thing about coffee is everyone’s an expert. As for your comment on Villino being better than Oomph – I am wondering what professional cupping you have done, how many competitions have you competed in and who do you consult to within the cafe industry? When you can tell me solid, reputable answers to those questions then I will assume that your comment is strictly YOUR opinion and prone to bias.

By: Paris

Paris — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:33:58 +0000

While I make no claims about the quality of Starbucks coffee (Chai Latte FTW) – I will say that there are very few places in Hobart that would tolerate me (and workmates) spending most of the day there coding/working (and very few places in Hobart that have desks/comfortable chairs to work on).

For this reason I will miss Hobart Starbucks.

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:54:34 +0000

Interesting blog. I'll take a look at it more closely later -- I do tend to admire people who do their own roasting, especially since it gives the opportunity to make blends that may not necessarily appeal to the general public (and they're the sorts of blends that I prefer).

In relation to the consistency of cafe's as compared with good home baristas, I would tend to disagree with your assertion that no cafe is consistent. Oomph (in particular) have only three full-time baristas (all three of then consistently win awards), and basically every coffee I have from there is generally as good as each other.

Many other cafes do suffer from the problems you suggest though.

By: Joshua Hesketh

Joshua Hesketh — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:37:59 +0000

I would imagine that LCA goers have quite a high standard of coffee and would regard starbucks a black pile of muddy oil.

While Tassie does have some nice coffee, I must say there isn't anywhere consistently outstanding. Oomph isn't bad, but Villino on Criterion St. is much better generally speaking.

Personally I have acquired quite a high standard from coffee from the excessive amount of coffee my friends make. They roast their own blends from around the world and spend excessive amounts on their equipment. In other words, I don't bother trying with anywhere else as the standard that they have is far more consistent that any shop has (as it is too dependent on the staff). Check out my mates blog: http://www.blognow.com.au/coffee

Mm... LCA + coffee == happy hackers

By: AlphaG

AlphaG — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:26:29 +0000

Yes the coffee is absolutely horrible, but on a really hot and humid day the ice blended frappacinno is a blessing as it works on so many levels

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:01:12 +0000

Yeah, it is actually really good — wins heaps and heaps of awards… In Sydney, no less

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:43:42 +0000

Could it really be good coffee with a cheesy name like ‘Oomph’?

I didn’t mind Starbucks coffee, but it was somewhat overpriced, even for Sydney. ‘Coffee on Campus’, the coffee store conveniently tethered to the Computer Science building at UNSW, produce my preferred brew, but I’m up for experimenting with coffee Tasmanian style.

With any luck I’ll be able to convince the RTA to spend a few taxpayers dollars sending me across to LCA

By: Simon Rumble

Simon Rumble — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:47:33 +0000

I doubt there’ll be many tears shed from Starbucks going. They’re hugely successful in the US because the standard coffee there is so bad, and they’re marginally better. Here in Oz we’ve got bloody awesome coffee, so there’s just no reason to go to an inferior chain.

That is, unless you want a couple of drops of over-roasted, nasty coffee drowned in oodles of milk and sugary flavourings.