<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACM SPPC (And related excitement)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chris.neugebauer.id.au/2009/09/13/acm-sppc-and-related-excitement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chris.neugebauer.id.au/2009/09/13/acm-sppc-and-related-excitement/</link>
	<description>Indeed it is.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Neugebauer</title>
		<link>http://chris.neugebauer.id.au/2009/09/13/acm-sppc-and-related-excitement/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Neugebauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.neugebauer.id.au/2009/09/13/acm-sppc-and-related-excitement/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, standard BFS was fast enough for I -- the maximal state space for a 1000x1000 grid over 4 orientations is 4x10^6, which we were able to search out in ~2 seconds (by terminating on first discovery, and only putting new states into the queue, something you can do with BFS and not Dijkstra&#039;s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H was being worked on by Simon, using a standard solution to the Stable Marriages Problem; he did something that took O(N^3) time in there, and hence TLEd.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>Yes, standard BFS was fast enough for I &#8212; the maximal state space for a 1000&#215;1000 grid over 4 orientations is 4&#215;10^6, which we were able to search out in ~2 seconds (by terminating on first discovery, and only putting new states into the queue, something you can do with BFS and not Dijkstra&#8217;s).</p>
<p>H was being worked on by Simon, using a standard solution to the Stable Marriages Problem; he did something that took O(N^3) time in there, and hence TLEd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://chris.neugebauer.id.au/2009/09/13/acm-sppc-and-related-excitement/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chris.neugebauer.id.au/2009/09/13/acm-sppc-and-related-excitement/#comment-746</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting your analysis.&#160; I competed in UQ::TripleLinkedList as the coder.&#160; For Problem I, was a plain ol&#039; BFS fast enough?&#160; Our team went straight to the A* algorithm because we thought a BFS would be too slow for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;d be interested to know what your algorithm for H was, if you had that ready.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting your analysis.&nbsp; I competed in UQ::TripleLinkedList as the coder.&nbsp; For Problem I, was a plain ol&#8217; BFS fast enough?&nbsp; Our team went straight to the A* algorithm because we thought a BFS would be too slow for it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know what your algorithm for H was, if you had that ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

